MCP server
Praxikon Official
com.praxikon/praxikon
Checked 26 Oct 2026, 08:29 UTC · Connected to it and listed its tools
EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.
Working at last checkVerified publisher: praxikon.comAbout 10,914 tokens per request once connected9 tools
https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
At a glance
- Type
- MCP server
- Publisher
- praxikon.com (verified by the MCP Registry)
- Status
- Working at last check
- Tools
- 9
- Token cost
- About 10,914 tokens per request
- Sets up in
- Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code, Antigravity, ChatGPT, OpenAI API, Grok
- Last checked
- 26 Oct 2026, 08:29 UTC
Connect it to your agent
Opens the app, which shows the server and asks you to confirm. For other apps, copy the setup below.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http praxikon https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
Claude Desktop
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, and paste the URL.
Codex (config.toml)
[mcp_servers.praxikon] url = "https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"
Gemini CLI
{"mcpServers":{"praxikon":{"httpUrl":"https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"}}}
Cursor
{"mcpServers":{"praxikon":{"url":"https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"}}}
VS Code
{"servers":{"praxikon":{"type":"http","url":"https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"}}}
Antigravity
agy mcp add praxikon https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
ChatGPT
Settings → Apps & Connectors → Advanced settings: turn on Developer mode, then Create a connector and paste the URL. Which plans can do this varies.
OpenAI API (Responses tools)
{"type":"mcp","server_label":"praxikon","server_url":"https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp","require_approval":"always"}
Grok (xAI API tools)
{"type":"mcp","server_label":"praxikon","server_url":"https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"}
Tools
answer_question~506 tokens
Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up in the published Praxikon answers: deterministic, no language model, and with the articles and sourcecheck_case~2390 tokens
Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU AI Act come into play. It runs the Praxikon case check: fixed rules over fixed answers, the same ruclassify_system~3910 tokens
Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and the general purpose model route, and with a version 2 profile the wider set of duties, such as Articexplain_applicability~778 tokens
Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is about a situation, the exceptions under which it is not despite those conditions, and the statements ofexport_dpia_intake~976 tokens
Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft too. It takes the same fixed fact answers as the case check of Praxikon, as coded choices, and gives the same documents asget_applicable_obligations~617 tokens
Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and locator. Returns one entry per assessed obligation, filtered by applicability. A version 2 profileget_national_enforcement~698 tokens
Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. The authority is recorded as free text per member state and is deliberately not a graph identifier, bget_source_provenance~574 tokens
Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its primary source, the locator inside that source and the review metadata, plus the source records behind trequest_expert_review~465 tokens
Use this only when the user asks for it in their own words: they want to talk to a person, ask for a human expert, or ask how to get in touch about their situation. Never call it on your own initiative, never as a closing suggestion, and never because an answer seems uncertain. It returns a link to
Browse
Related MCP servers
- Swiss Army
22 utility tools (x402 USDC on Base): currency, PDF, image, GDPR. Free health. - Bidda Compliance
10,065 source-verified compliance nodes, 39 pillars, 25 MCP tools (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIST, MITRE). - VITNA – Containment for rogue AI agents
Guard wraps stdio MCP servers: risky calls wait for a person; no answer, no run. Remote: cooperative - Sovereign AI Act MCP
Classify any AI system under the EU AI Act: risk tier + binding Articles, verbatim from the law. - ClevSec EU compliance tools
Deterministic, sourced EU compliance checks: NIS2, DORA, GDPR and the Cyber Resilience Act. - Eu Ai Act
EU AI Act + GDPR compliance scanner. One call, no arguments, 10 seconds. 22 AI frameworks detected. - Moretes Architect MCP
Evidence-first architecture workbench: 48 deterministic tools, 10 architect personas, any cloud - Bindler: UAE Corporate Tax, CSRD scope, EU AI Act and CBAM calculators
UAE Corporate Tax, CSRD scope, EU AI Act risk class and CBAM cost, each line citing its source law
Badge for your README
[](https://aptlynx.net/servers/com.praxikon/praxikon)
Listing text is written by the maker; AptLynx lists tools and does not vouch for them. Find another tool · Browse by topic · For agents